Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR Nos. 217126-27 2015-11-10	CONCHITA CARPIO MORALES v. CA PERLAS-BERNABE, J.
In Echegaray v. Secretary of Justice[195] (Echegaray), the Court traced the evolution of its rule-making authority, which, under the 1935[196] and 1973 Constitutions,[197] had been priorly subjected to a power-sharing scheme with Congress.[198] As it now stands, the 1987 Constitution textually altered the old provisions by deleting the concurrent power of Congress to amend the rules, thus solidifying in one body the Court's rule-making powers, in line with the Framers' vision of institutionalizing a "[s]tronger and more independent judiciary."[199]
	Am. No. 12-2-03-0 2012-03-13	RE: IN MATTER OF CLARIFICATION OF EXEMPTION FROM PAYMENT OF ALL COURT PEREZ, J.
In a decision dated 26 February 2010 in Baguio Market Vendors Multi-Purpose Cooperative (BAMARVEMPCO) v. Cabato-Cortes,[18] this Court reiterated its ruling in the GSIS case when it denied the petition of the cooperative to be exempted from the payment of legal fees under Section 7(c) of Rule 141 of the Rules of Court relative to fees in petitions for extra-judicial foreclosure.