Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

SPS. WILLIAM GENATO AND REBECCA GENATO v. RITA VIOLA

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 168258 2015-08-17	RICARDO V. QUINTOS v. DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PHILIPPINES LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
Furthermore, Quintos can be held in estoppel on the basis of his acts contemporaneous and subsequent to the execution of the loan and collateral contracts. "Where a party, by his or her deed or conduct, has induced another to act in a particular manner, estoppel effectively bars the former from adopting an inconsistent position, attitude or course of conduct that causes loss or injury to the latter. The doctrine of estoppel is based upon the grounds of public policy, fair dealing, good faith and justice, and its purpose is to forbid one to speak against his own act, representations, or commitments to the injury of one to whom they were directed and who reasonably relied thereon."[74] After consistently recognizing NIDC/PNB and DBP as mortgage creditors of GCFI, Quintos is now estopped from adopting a contrary position which denies the same.
	GR No. 184036 2010-10-13	PACIFIC REHOUSE CORPORATION v. EIB SECURITIES VELASCO JR., J.
[W]here a party, by his or her deed or conduct, has induced another to act in particular manner, estoppel effectively bars the former from adopting an inconsistent position, attitude or course of conduct that causes loss or injury to the latter. The doctrine of estoppel is based upon the grounds of public policy, fair dealing, good faith and justice, and its purpose is to forbid one to speak against his own act, representations, or commitments to the injury of one whom they were directed and who reasonably relied thereon.[38]