Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR NO. 168732 2007-06-29	NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION v. LUCMAN G. IBRAHIM AZCUNA, J.
In the past, the Court has held that if the government takes property without expropriation and devotes the property to public use, after many years, the property owner may demand payment of just compensation in the event restoration of possession is neither convenient nor feasible.[13] This is in accordance with the principle that persons shall not be deprived of their property except by competent authority and for public use and always upon payment of just compensation.[14]
	GR NO. 143870 2005-09-30	MANILA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY v. RIVERA VILLAGE LESSEE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TINGA, J.
Resort to mandamus is evidently premature because there is no showing that the members of the homeowners association have already filed an application or proposal with the NHA to acquire their respective lots. There is still an administrative remedy open to the members of the homeowners association which they should have first pursued, failing which they cannot invoke judicial action.[31]
	GR No. 106804 2004-08-12	NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION v. CA CARPIO, J.
feasible anymore to do so, the only remedy available to the aggrieved landowner is to demand payment of just compensation.[43]