This case has been cited 1 times or more.
2003-12-01 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
The fact that petitioner failed to show it suffered losses in revenue as a consequence of private respondent's questioned act is immaterial. The fact that respondent attempted to deprive petitioner of its lawful revenue is tantamount to fraud against the company, which warrants dismissal from the service.[16] |