This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2009-06-05 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| Arbitration is one of the alternative methods of dispute resolution that is now rightfully vaunted as "the wave of the future" in international relations, and is recognized worldwide. To brush aside a contractual agreement calling for arbitration in case of disagreement between the parties would therefore be a step backward.[35] | |||||
|
2007-08-17 |
SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J. |
||||
| This Court has previously held that arbitration is one of the alternative methods of dispute resolution that is now rightfully vaunted as "the wave of the future" in international relations, and is recognized worldwide. To brush aside a contractual agreement calling for arbitration in case of disagreement between the parties would therefore be a step backward.[16] | |||||
|
2005-11-23 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
| A cause of action has three elements, to wit: (1) the legal right of the plaintiff, (2) the correlative obligation of the defendant, and (3) the act or omission of the defendant in violation of said legal right. In the determination of whether these elements are present, inquiry is generally confined to the four corners of the complaint and no other,[15] but the annexes attached to the complaint may be considered, they being parts thereof.[16] | |||||