Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ALLIANCE OF EDUCATORS v. LEONARDO A. QUISUMBING

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 200114 2015-08-24	SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM v. DEBBIE UBAÑA DEL CASTILLO, J.
In this jurisdiction, the "long honored legal truism of 'equal pay for equal work'" has been "impregnably institutionalized;" "[p]ersons who work with substantially equal qualifications, skill, effort and responsibility, under similar conditions, should be paid similar salaries."[27] "That public policy abhors inequality and discrimination is beyond contention. Our Constitution and laws reflect the policy against these evils. The Constitution in the Article on Social Justice and Human Rights exhorts Congress to 'give highest priority to the enactment of measures that protect and enhance the right of all people to human dignity, reduce social, economic, and political inequalities.' The very broad Article 19 of the Civil Code requires every person, 'in the exercise of his rights and in the performance of his duties, [to] act with justice, give everyone his due, and observe honesty and good faith'."[28]
	GR No. 183871 2010-02-18	LOURDES D. RUBRICO v. GLORIA MACAPAGAL-ARROYO VELASCO JR., J.
Gen. Esperon manifested his resolve to provide the CA with material results of the investigation; to continue with the probe on the alleged abduction of Lourdes and to bring those responsible, including military personnel, to the bar of justice when warranted by the findings and the competent evidence that may be gathered in the investigation process by those mandated to look into the matter;[5]
	GR NO. 149758 2005-08-25	PHILEX GOLD PHILIPPINES v. PHILEX BULAWAN SUPERVISORS UNION AZCUNA, J.
Petitioners submit that the "equal pay for equal work" doctrine in International School Alliance of Educators v. Quisumbing,[16] which the Court of Appeals cited to support its Decision should be narrowly construed to apply to a situation where invidious discrimination exists by reason of race or ethnicity, but not where valid factors exist to justify distinctive treatment of employees even if they do the same work.
	GR No. 148208 2004-12-15	CENTRAL BANK EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION v. BANGKO SENTRAL NG PILIPINAS PUNO, J.
Apropos the special protection afforded to labor under our Constitution and international law, we held in International School Alliance of Educators v. Quisumbing:[93]