You're currently signed in as:
User

CARMELINO M. SANTIAGO v. CA

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

2008-12-18
TINGA, J.
On 12 December 2005, the Court's First Division rendered its Decision[26] affirming the two decisions of the Court of Appeals.[27] The Manotoks filed a motion for reconsideration, which the Court's First Division denied in a Resolution dated 19 April 2006.[28] Thereafter, the Manotoks' filed a Motion for Leave to File a Second Motion for Reconsideration, with their Motion for Reconsideration attached. The Court denied the same in a Resolution dated 19 June 2006, and the Court further ordered that entry of judgment be made.[29] Thus on 2 May 2006, entry of judgment was made in the Book of Entries of Judgment.[30]
2001-05-28
PARDO, J.
When the factual findings of the Court of Appeals are supported by substantial evidence, they are conclusive and binding on the parties.[31] "Substantial evidence" is that amount of relevant evidence which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to justify the conclusion.[32] We find that substantial evidence supports the finding of the Court of Appeals.
2001-02-28
PARDO, J.
These factual rulings are binding on us.[53]