This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2004-11-25 |
PANGANIBAN, J. |
||||
| We agree with the appellate court. Indeed, what respondent instituted against petitioners was a real action for the recovery of property. It has been held that where a party makes a claim contrary to ownership, and the relief prayed for cannot be granted without the court deciding on who has a better right to the property, the suit is a real action.[34] | |||||