This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2009-07-07 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| With respect to the OCA's finding that respondent obtained loans from court personnel and lawyers in amounts ranging from P500 to P5,000, the Court takes exception to the OCA's conclusion that such act attaches no administrative liability. That the loans had already been paid or waived by the creditors do not detract from the fact that certain prohibitions were violated. That the loans were obtained way back in 1991-1992 is of no moment, considering that administrative offenses do not prescribe.[36] | |||||
|
2006-07-11 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| Pacariem ought to be reminded that the image of the court as a true temple of justice is mirrored by the conduct of everyone who works thereat, from the judge to the lowest clerk.[15] Hence, one's every act and word should be characterized by prudence, restraint, courtesy and dignity.[16] This norm of behavior must be observed not only when dealing with other people but also, more importantly, when dealing with a superior. In our view, Pacariem failed to live up to this standard. We do note, however, that she later admitted her mistake and apologized for her indiscretion, a matter that we believe should mitigate her administrative liability. | |||||