This case has been cited 1 times or more.
2015-10-21 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
It has already been established that appellants were the ones who raped AAA. The DNA test is not essential, while there exists other evidence pinning down appellants as the perpetrators.[58] Moreover, if the prosecution had not conducted such DNA test, appellants should have moved for such test during the trial to prove their innocence. |