You're currently signed in as:
User

DUTY FREE PHILIPPINES v. ROSSANO J. MOJICA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2010-07-05
VILLARAMA, JR., J.
On August 31, 2006, the appellate court promulgated the assailed Decision in CA-G.R. SP No. 84801 granting AFPCES' petition. The Court of Appeals, after applying the Supreme Court's pronouncement in Duty Free Philippines v. Mojica,[17] explained that since AFPCES is a governmental agency that has no personality separate and distinct from the AFP, petitioners are considered civil service employees, and that complaints for illegal dismissal should therefore be lodged not with the Labor Arbiter but with the CSC.[18]