Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

LIBRADA D. TORRES v. NELSON C. CABESUELA

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	AM No. P-12-3027 2012-01-30	LUIS P. PINEDA v. NEIL T. TORRES PERALTA, J.
Precisely, Administrative Circular No. 12 was promulgated in order to streamline the service and execution of court writs and processes in courts and to better serve the public good and facilitate the administration of justice.[10] The requirement of notice is based on the rudiments of justice and fair play. It frowns upon arbitrariness and oppressive conduct in the execution of an otherwise legitimate act. It is an amplification of the provision that every person must, in the exercise of his rights and in the performance of his duties, act with justice, give everyone his due, and observe honesty and good faith.[11] An immediate enforcement of a writ does not mean the abdication of the notification requirement.[12]
	AM No. P-09-2644 2009-07-30	EDGARDO A. QUILO v. ROGELIO G. JUNDARINO CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
The Court has even higher expectations from its sheriffs. Sheriffs play an important role in the administration of justice, and they should always invigorate and hold in violate the tenet that a public office is a public trust.[21] Being at the grassroots of our judicial machinery, sheriffs and deputy sheriffs are in close contact with the litigants; hence, their conduct should all the more maintain the prestige and the integrity of the court.[22] By the very nature of their functions, sheriffs must conduct themselves with propriety and decorum, so as to be above suspicion.[23] Sheriffs cannot afford to err in serving court writs and processes and in implementing court orders, lest they undermine the integrity of their office and the efficient administration of justice.[24]
	AM No. P-09-2644 2009-06-30	EDGARDO A. QUILO v. ROGELIO G. JUNDARINO CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
The Court has even higher expectations from its sheriffs. Sheriffs play an important role in the administration of justice, and they should always invigorate and hold in violate the tenet that a public office is a public trust.[21] Being at the grassroots of our judicial machinery, sheriffs and deputy sheriffs are in close contact with the litigants; hence, their conduct should all the more maintain the prestige and the integrity of the court.[22] By the very nature of their functions, sheriffs must conduct themselves with propriety and decorum, so as to be above suspicion.[23] Sheriffs cannot afford to err in serving court writs and processes and in implementing court orders, lest they undermine the integrity of their office and the efficient administration of justice.[24]