This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2012-02-01 |
SERENO, J. |
||||
| Finally, the issue raised by respondent is ripe for judicial determination, because litigation is inevitable[19] for the simple and uncontroverted reason that respondent is not included in the enumeration of flour millers classified as food grade wheat importers. Thus, as the trial court stated, it would have to file a protest case each time it imports food grade wheat and be subjected to the 7% tariff. | |||||
|
2007-01-31 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| For such an action for declaratory relief before a trial court to prosper, it must be shown that (a) there is a justiciable controversy, (b) the controversy is between persons whose interests are adverse, (c) the party seeking the relief has a legal interest in the controversy, and (d) the issue invoked is ripe for judicial determination.[10] Respondents contest the presence of the first and last requisites insofar as petitioner's case is concerned. | |||||
|
2005-10-05 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| The requisites of a petition for declaratory relief are: (1) there must be a justiciable controversy; (2) the controversy must be between persons whose interests are adverse; (3) that the party seeking the relief has a legal interest in the controversy; and (4) that the issue is ripe for judicial determination.[8] | |||||