You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. GUILLERMO CARIÑO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2012-06-20
PERALTA, J.
Respondent filed his Answer[13] denying the charges against him. He explained that as to the Nature Cafe's Sales Invoice No. 31203  in the amount of P2,204.00,  he had no control in the preparation of the said sales invoice,  particularly the duplicate copy thereof; that if the duplicate copy was left blank, then it should be the establishment which must be investigated before the BIR; that the sales invoice given to him bore the cashier's signature evidencing receipt of the amount indicated therein and presumed to be valid, since it was numbered and contained the tax identification number of the establishment;  and that he is a member of UMVHAI but it was possible that his identity was not known to the cafe's staff, thus the official receipt was issued to UMVHAI.