This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2002-09-18 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| We are not convinced. In Cochingyan v. Court of Appeals,[21] we reiterated our ruling in Fagtanac vs. Court of Appeals,[22] that: "x x x it is the duty of the appellant to prosecute his appeal with reasonable diligence. He cannot simply fold his arms and say that it is the duty of the Clerk of Court of First Instance under the provisions of Section 11, Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, to transmit | |||||