Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

HEIRS OF RAMON DURANO v. SPS. ANGELES SEPULVEDA UY AND EMIGDIO BING SING UY

This case has been cited 5 times or more.

	GR No. 182770 2014-09-17	WPM INTERNATIONAL TRADING v. FE CORAZON LABAYEN BRION, J.
We note, at the outset, that the question of whether a corporation is a mere instrumentality or alter-ego of another is purely one of fact.[5] This is also true with respect to the question of whether the totality of the evidence adduced by the respondent warrants the application of the piercing the veil of corporate fiction doctrine.[6]
	GR No. 165025 2011-08-31	FEDMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. FEDERICO AGCAOILI BERSAMIN, J.
FDC's claim that it was distinct in personality from FSCC is unworthy of consideration due to its being a question of fact that cannot be reviewed under Rule 45.[40]
	GR No. 180123 2010-02-18	KULAS IDEAS v. JULIET ALCOSEBA CARPIO MORALES, J.
While as a general rule, a party who has not appealed is not entitled to any affirmative relief other than the one granted in the decision of the court below, the Court is imbued with sufficient authority and discretion to review matters not otherwise assigned as errors on appeal, if it finds that their consideration is necessary in arriving at a complete and just resolution of the case[38] [39]or to serve the interests of justice or to avoid dispensing piecemeal justice. The present case does not fall into any of the exceptions.
	GR No. 146608 2003-10-23	SPS. CONSTANTE FIRME AND AZUCENA E. FIRME v. BUKAL ENTERPRISES CARPIO, J.
The award of damages is also in accordance with Article 451 of the Civil Code which states that the landowner is entitled to damages from the builder in bad faith.[65]
	GR No. 145280 2001-12-04	ST. MICHAEL'S INSTITUTE v. CARMELITA A. SANTOS DE LEON, JR., J.
The fact that the NLRC did not award backwages to the respondents or that the respondents themselves did not appeal the NLRC decision does not bar the Court of Appeals from awarding backwages. While as a general rule, a party who has not appealed is not entitled to affirmative relief other than the ones granted in the decision of the court below, the Court of Appeals is imbued with sufficient authority and discretion to review matters, not otherwise assigned as errors on appeal, if it finds that their consideration is necessary in arriving at a complete and just resolution of the case[27] or to serve the interests of justice or to avoid dispensing piecemeal justice.[28]