This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2013-06-17 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| From the foregoing provision, the Court in a very similar case, made it categorically clear that the mere unauthorized use of a container bearing a registered trademark in connection with the sale, distribution or advertising of goods or services which is likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception among the buyers or consumers can be considered as trademark infringement.[9] | |||||