This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2006-11-22 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| Also, we view respondent's act of filing her resignation before the investigation as indicative of her guilt. Indeed, an employee's act of tendering her resignation immediately after the discovery of the anomalous transaction is indicative of her guilt as flight in criminal cases.[21] And, resignation is not a way out to evade administrative liability when a court employee is facing administrative sanction.[22] | |||||