This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2013-02-25 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| This Court, however, has previously stressed that mere association with the principals by direct participation, without more, does not suffice.[132] Relationship, association and companionship do not prove conspiracy.[133] Salapuddin's complicity to the crime, if this be the case, cannot be anchored on his relationship, if any, with the arrested persons or his ownership of the place where they allegedly stayed while in Manila. | |||||