This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-04-27 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| The CA and respondent are of the view that upon approval of the investigating prosecutor's recommendation for the filing of an information against respondent, the period of prescription began to run again. The Court does not agree. It is a well-settled rule that the filing of the complaint with the fiscal's office suspends the running of the prescriptive period.[6] | |||||