Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	AM NO. 04-6-313-RTC 2006-02-16	LETTER OF ATTY. SOCORRO M. VILLAMER-BASILLA CARPIO MORALES, J.
The conduct and behavior of everyone connected with an office charged with the dispensation of justice is circumscribed with a heavy burden of responsibility, necessarily so if the faith and confidence of the people in the judiciary[8] are to be maintained.
	AM NO. P-06-2128 2006-02-16	LETTER OF ATTY. SOCORRO M. VILLAMER-BASILLA CARPIO MORALES, J.
The conduct and behavior of everyone connected with an office charged with the dispensation of justice is circumscribed with a heavy burden of responsibility, necessarily so if the faith and confidence of the people in the judiciary[8] are to be maintained.
	AM No. 2002-6-SC 2003-02-05	ALEJANDREA GURO v. SUSAN M. DORONIO PUNO, J.
Respondent, as a court employee, is covered by the Civil Service Law.[10] As provided for in Book V of The Administrative Code of 1987 (Executive Order No. 292), neglect of duty is a ground for disciplinary action.[11] Simple neglect of duty is considered a less grave offense and is punished with suspension for one (1) month and one (1) day to six (6) months for the first offense, and dismissal for the second offense.[12]