This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2015-06-17 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Lastly, the Court does not agree with petitioner's insistence that his being hired as respondent corporation's administrator and his designation as such in intra-company correspondence proves that he is an employee of the corporation. The fact alone that petitioner was designated as an administrator does not necessarily mean that he is an employee of respondents. Mere title or designation in a corporation will not, by itself, determine the existence of an employer-employee relationship.[42] In this regard, even the identification card which was issued to petitioner is not an adequate proof of petitioner's claim that he is respondents' employee. In addition, petitioner's designation as an administrator neither disproves respondents' contention that he was engaged only as a consultant. | |||||
|
2010-10-20 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| In Okol v. Slimmers World International,[40] citing Tabang v. National Labor Relations Commission,[41] we held that - | |||||