This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2006-01-23 |
SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J. |
||||
| It is clear from petitioner's allegations that the matters being raised the alleged incomplete canvass of plebiscite votes during the revision proceedings and the irregularities, frauds, and anomalies purportedly committed therein are factual in nature. They involve an examination of the admissibility and sufficiency of the evidence presented during the revision proceedings before the COMELEC. Certainly, this we cannot do in the present special civil actions for certiorari under Rule 65 of the 1987 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended. Section 1 of the same Rule confines the power of this Court to resolve issues mainly involving jurisdiction, including grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or in excess of jurisdiction attributed to the public respondent.[11] | |||||