You're currently signed in as:
User

ROGER V. NAVARRO v. JOSE L. ESCOBIDO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2013-06-03
PERALTA, J.
Further, the Court even ruled in Navarro v. Escobido[15] that prior demand is not a condition precedent to an action for a writ of replevin, since there is nothing in Section 2, Rule 60 of the Rules of Court that requires the applicant to make a demand on the possessor of the property before an action for a writ of replevin could be filed.