You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

DILY DANY NACPIL v. INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING CORPORATION

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR No. 157802
2010-10-13
MATLING INDUSTRIAL v. RICARDO R. COROS
BERSAMIN, J.
In Nacpil v. Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation,[23] which may be the more appropriate ruling, the position subject of the controversy was not expressly mentioned in the By-Laws, but was created pursuant to a By-Law enabling provision authorizing the Board of Directors to create other offices that the Board of Directors might see fit to create. The Court held there that the position was a corporate office, relying on the obiter dictum in Tabang.