Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. BALTAZAR AMION Y DUGADUGA

This case has been cited 5 times or more.

	GR No. 146100 2002-11-13	PEOPLE v. JOHNNY LOTERONO YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
of any modifying circumstance to aggravate or to mitigate criminal liability.[67] Reclusion Temporal in its medium period has a range of fourteen (14) years, eight (8) months and one (1) day to seventeen (17) years and four (4) months. Applying the Indeterminate Sentence Law, the imposable penalty shall range from ten (10) years and one (1) day of Prision Mayor, as minimum, to seventeen (17) years and four (4) months of Reclusion Temporal, as maximum. On the issue of damages, following prevailing jurisprudence[68] and in line with controlling policy, the amount of P50,000.00 should be given as indemnity ex delicto for the death of the victim without any need of proof[69]
	GR No. 146687 2002-08-22	PEOPLE v. BONNIE R. RABANAL YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
there is no modifying circumstance to aggravate or to mitigate criminal liability.[49] Applying the Indeterminate Sentence Law, accused-appellant shall be entitled to a minimum term, to be taken from the penalty next lower in degree, Prision Mayor. Thus, accused-appellant shall be sentenced to an indeterminate penalty of eight (8) years and one (1) day of Prision Mayor, as minimum, to fourteen (14) years, eight (8) months and one (1) day of Reclusion Temporal, as maximum. Coming now to the matter of damages, we affirm the award of civil indemnity in the amount of P50,000.00, pursuant to prevailing jurisprudence.[50] Such award requires no proof other than the death of the victim.[51] Likewise, the
	GR No. 142905 2002-03-18	PEOPLE v. RAMIL GUTIERREZ YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
We find the trial court's award of P50,000.00 as civil indemnity for the death of the victim proper.[48] Moral damages in the amount of P50,000.00 should have been also awarded by the trial court taking into consideration the pain and anguish of the victim's family brought about by his death.[49]
	GR Nos. 140557-58 2001-12-05	PEOPLE v. EDGARDO HERRERA YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
Following prevailing jurisprudence[90] and in line with controlling policy, the Court finds the award of P50,000.00 as civil indemnity for the death of the victims proper without any need of proof[91] other than the death of the victim.[92] The award of moral damages by the trial court to the victims' heirs is likewise proper and is pegged at P50,000.00 by controlling case law[93] taking into consideration the pain and anguish of the victim's family[94] brought about by his death.[95]
	GR No. 137457 2001-11-21	PEOPLE v. ROSAURO SIA Y DICHOSO YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
Anent the civil indemnity award, this Court finds the amount of P50,000.00 as death indemnity proper, following prevailing jurisprudence,[48] and in line with controlling policy.[49] The award of civil indemnity may be granted without any need of proof other than the death of the victim.[50] Though not awarded by the trial court, the victim's heirs are likewise entitled to moral damages, pegged at P50,000.00 by controlling case law,[51] taking into consideration the pain and anguish of the victim's family[52] brought about by his death.[53]