Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

SUSAN NICDAO CARIÑO v. SUSAN YEE CARIÑO

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 181174 2009-12-04	MA. CRISTINA TORRES BRAZA v. CITY CIVIL REGISTRAR OF HIMAMAYLAN CITY CARPIO MORALES, J.
Petitioners maintain that the court a quo may pass upon the validity of marriage and questions on legitimacy even in an action to correct entries in the civil registrar. Citing Cariño v. Cariño,[11] Lee v. Court of Appeals[12] and Republic v. Kho,[13] they contend that even substantial errors, such as those sought to be corrected in the present case, can be the subject of a petition under Rule 108.[14]
	GR NO. 167684 2006-07-31	JAIME O. SEVILLA v. CARMELITA N. CARDENAS CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
At first glance, this case can very well be easily dismissed as one involving a marriage that is null and void on the ground of absence of a marriage license based on the certifications issued by the Local Civil Registar of San Juan. As ruled by this Court in the case of Cariño v. Cariño[13]:[A]s certified by the Local Civil Registrar of San Juan, Metro Manila, their office has no record of such marriage license. In Republic v. Court of Appeals, the Court held that such a certification is adequate to prove the non-issuance of a marriage license. Absent any circumstance of suspicion, as in the present case, the certification issued by the local civil registrar enjoys probative value, he being the officer charged under the law to keep a record of all date relative to the issuance of a marriage license.
	GR No. 159218 2004-03-30	SALVADOR S. ABUNADO v. PEOPLE YNARES-SATIAGO, J.
On January 19, 1995, an annulment case was filed by Salvador against Narcisa.[4] On May 18, 1995, a case for bigamy was filed by Narcisa against Salvador and Zenaida.[5]