This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2012-12-04 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Factual findings of administrative bodies charged with their specific field of expertise, are afforded great weight by the courts, and in the absence of substantial showing that such findings were made from an erroneous estimation of the evidence presented, they are conclusive, and in the interest of stability of the governmental structure, should not be disturbed.[24] | |||||
|
2012-02-14 |
REYES, J. |
||||
| This Court finds no reason to deviate from prevailing jurisprudence, stating that disallowed benefits received in good faith need not be refunded. As stated in Lumayna v. Commission on Audit:[33] | |||||