You're currently signed in as:
User

RICARDO S. SILVERIO v. CA

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2013-03-06
CARPIO, J.
Conversely, an interlocutory order "does not dispose of the case completely but leaves something to be decided upon"[17] by the court. Its effects are merely provisional in character and substantial proceedings have to be further conducted by the court in order to finally resolve the issue or controversy.[18]
2009-12-14
DEL CASTILLO, J.
As early as 1916,[4] Juan Mari, the father of respondent, declared his ownership over a parcel of land in Nancasalan, Mangatarem for tax purposes. He took possession of the same by delineating the limits with a bamboo fence,[5] planting various fruit bearing trees and bamboos[6] and constructing a house thereon.[7] After a survey made in 1950, Tax Declaration No. 8048[8] for the year 1951 specified the subject realty as a residential land with an area of 897 square meters and as having the following boundaries: North - Magdalena Fernandez; South - Catalina Cacayorin; East - Camino Vecinal; and West - Norberto Bugarin. In 1974, the subject realty was transferred to respondent, Pedro Mari, by virtue of a deed of sale.