Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 167510 2015-07-08	ALVIN MERCADO v. PEOPLE BERSAMIN, J.
We also made a similar observation in Remlgio v. Sandiganbayan[46] which involved a customs broker, to wit: Petitioner Remigio did not make or attempt to make an entry of imported articles by means of any false or fraudulent invoice, declaration, affidavit, letter, paper, or by means of any false statement, verbal or oral, or by means of any false or fraudulent practice whatsoever, x x x
	GR NO. 165265 2006-02-06	MARIBEL B. JARDELEZA v. PEOPLE CALLEJO, SR., J.
The fraud contemplated by law must be intentional fraud, consisting of deception, willfully and deliberately dared or resorted to in order to give up some right.[78] The offender must have acted knowingly and with the specific intent to deceive for the purpose of causing financial loss to another; even false representations or statements or omissions of material facts come within fraudulent intent.[79] The fraud envisaged in the law includes the suppression of a material fact which a party is bound in good faith to disclose. Fraudulent nondisclosure and fraudulent concealment are of the same genre.[80]