This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2006-09-27 |
AZCUNA, J. |
||||
| In the present case, however, the circumstances surrounding the ownership of the property that is central to the parties' disagreement are put at issue. A resolution of this point will require a re-evaluation of the evidence on record. In an appeal via certiorari, the Court may not review the factual findings of the CA,[13] and petitioners have not shown that this case falls under any of the recognized exceptions to this rule.[14] | |||||
|
2005-04-28 |
SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J. |
||||
| Here, petitioner is asking us to calibrate the whole evidence anew and consider once again the credibility of witnesses and make another factual determination based thereon a course of action which is clearly improper given the nature of the instant petition.[9] In other words, what petitioner is raising before us are questions of fact not proper for our consideration.[10] | |||||