This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2013-11-26 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| However, we note that this is not the first time that respondent has been administratively sanctioned. In Manaog v. Rubio,[57] respondent was found guilty of simple misconduct for which he was suspended from the service for one month and one day without pay. The Court held therein that respondent together with his co-respondent had shown lack of decorum, propriety, and respect in their dealings with other people. Subsequently, in Sales v. Rubio,[58] the Court also found respondent, then Sheriff of the Municipal Circuit Trial Court of Magarao-Canaman, Camarines Sur, guilty of violation of Section 10, Rule 141 of the Rules of Court and of Discourtesy, and was again suspended for six months without pay. In both instances, this Court sternly warned respondent that a repetition of the same or similar offense or offenses shall be dealt with more severely. | |||||