This case has been cited 3 times or more.
2011-02-15 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
SO ORDERED.[4] | |||||
2011-02-15 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
(o) all matters involving policy decisions in the administrative supervision of all courts and their personnel.[6] (underscoring supplied) | |||||
2011-02-15 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
In Firestone Ceramics v. Court of Appeals,[9] the Court treated the consolidated cases as En Banc cases and set the therein petitioners' motion for oral argument, after finding that the cases were of sufficient importance to merit the Court En Banc's attention. It ruled that the Court's action is a legitimate and valid exercise of its residual power.[10] |