This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2013-04-02 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| - Failure to establish that the nominees actually belong to the sector. Resolution dated 7 November 2012[36] 27 204359 12-272 (PLM) Social Movement for Active Reform and Transparency (SMART) Cancelled registration | |||||
|
2012-01-24 |
BERSAMIN, J. |
||||
| In his opposition,[18] Bautista countered that the assailed orders, being merely interlocutory, could not be elevated to the COMELEC en banc pursuant to the ruling in Panlilio v. COMELEC;[19] that the rules of the COMELEC required the initiatory petition to specify the acts or omissions constituting the electoral frauds, anomalies and election irregularities, and to contain the ultimate facts upon which the cause of action was based; and that Peña v. House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal did not apply because, firstly, Peña had totally different factual antecedents than this case, and, secondly, the omission of material facts from Peña's protest prevented the protestee (Alfredo E. Abueg, Jr.) from being apprised of the issues that he must meet and made it eventually impossible for the HRET to determine which ballot boxes had to be collected. | |||||
|
2011-10-04 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| In the same manner, this Court, in the case of Panlilio v. Commission on Elections, [17] restated the prevailing principle that the COMELEC's rules of procedure for the verification of protests and certifications of non-forum shopping should be liberally construed. | |||||