Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 195649 2013-04-16	CASAN MACODE MAQUILING v. COMELEC SERENO, C.J.
Clearly then, Maquiling has the right to intervene in the case. The fact that the COMELEC En Banc has already ruled that Maquiling has not shown that the requisites for the exemption to the second-placer rule set forth in Sinsuat v. COMELEC[30] are present and therefore would not be prejudiced by the outcome of the case, does not deprive Maquiling of the right to elevate the matter before this Court.
	GR No. 198742 2012-08-10	TEODORA SOBEJANA-CONDON v. COMELEC REYES, J.
Hence, in De Guzman v. COMELEC,[24] we declared petitioner therein to be disqualified from running for the position of vice-mayor for his failure to make a personal and sworn renunciation of his American citizenship.