Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

JOAQUIN SOLIMAN v. PAMPANGA SUGAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

This case has been cited 5 times or more.

	GR No. 155580 2015-07-01	ROMEO T. CALUZOR v. DEOGRACIAS LLANILLO BERSAMIN, J.
For tenancy relationship to exist, therefore, the following elements must be shown to concur, to wit: (1) the parties are the landowner and the tenant; (2) the subject matter is agricultural land; (3) there is consent between the parties to the relationship; (4) the purpose is of the relationship is to bring about agricultural production; (5) there is personal cultivation on the part of the tenant or agricultural lessee; and (6) the harvest is shared between landowner and tenant or agricultural lessee.[23] The presence of all these elements must be proved by substantial evidence;[24] this means that the absence of one will not make an alleged tenant a de jure tenant.[25] Unless a person has established his status as a de jure tenant, he is not entitled to security of tenure or to be covered by the Land Reform Program of the Government under existing tenancy laws.[26]
	GR No. 192026 2014-10-01	AUTOMAT REALTY v. SPS. MARCIANO DELA CRUZ LEONEN, J.
This court has held that a MARO certification "concerning the presence or the absence of a tenancy relationship between the contending parties, is considered merely preliminary or provisional, hence, such certification does not bind the judiciary."[48]
	GR No. 171972 2011-06-08	LUCIA RODRIGUEZ v. TERESITA V. SALVADOR DEL CASTILLO, J.
Agricultural tenancy exists when all the following requisites are present: 1) the parties are the landowner and the tenant or agricultural lessee; 2) the subject matter of the relationship is an agricultural land; 3) there is consent between the parties to the relationship; 4) the purpose of the relationship is to bring about agricultural production; 5) there is personal cultivation on the part of the tenant or agricultural lessee; and 6) the harvest is shared between landowner and tenant or agricultural lessee.[39]
	GR No. 179024 2011-05-30	ESTATE OF PASTOR M. SAMSON v. MERCEDES R. SUSANO VILLARAMA, JR., J.
For a tenancy relationship to exist between the parties, the following essential elements must be shown: (1) the parties are the landowner and the tenant; (2) the subject matter is agricultural land; (3) there is consent between the parties; (4) the purpose is agricultural production; (5) there is personal cultivation by the tenant; and (6) there is sharing of the harvests between the parties.[60] The presence of all of these elements must be proved by substantial evidence.[61]
	GR No. 156038 2010-10-11	SPS. VICTORIANO CHUNG AND DEBBIE CHUNG v. ULANDAY CONSTRUCTION BRION, J.
Estoppel in pais, or equitable estoppel, arises when one, by his acts, representations or admissions or by his silence when he ought to speak out, intentionally or through culpable negligence, induces another to believe certain facts to exist and the other rightfully relies and acts on such beliefs so that he will be prejudiced if the former is permitted to deny the existence of such facts.[48] The real office of the equitable norm of estoppel is limited to supplying deficiency in the law, but it should not supplant positive law.[49]