Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

JOSE PEPITO M. AMORES v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 194994 2013-04-16	EMMANUEL A. DE CASTRO v. EMERSON S. CARLOS SERENO, J.
Amores v. Civil Service Commission[38] is instructive as to the nature of temporary appointments in the CES. The Court held therein that an appointee cannot hold a position in a permanent capacity without the required CES eligibility: We begin with the precept, firmly established by law and jurisprudence that a permanent appointment in the civil service is issued to a person who has met the requirements of the position to which the appointment is made in accordance with law and the rules issued pursuant thereto. An appointment is permanent where the appointee meets all the requirements for the position to which he is being appointed, including the appropriate eligibility prescribed, and it is temporary where the appointee meets all the requirements for the position except only the appropriate civil service eligibility.
	GR No. 184219 2012-01-30	SAMUEL B. ONG v. OFFICE OF PRESIDENT REYES, J.
The case of Amores v. Civil Service Commission, et al.[38] is instructive anent the nature of temporary appointments in the CES to which the position of Director III held by Ong belonged. The Court declared: An appointment is permanent where the appointee meets all the requirements for the position to which he is being appointed, including the appropriate eligibility prescribed, and it is temporary where the appointee meets all the requirements for the position except only the appropriate civil service eligibility.
	GR No. 183337 2010-04-23	CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION v. GREGORIO MAGNAYE MENDOZA, J.
Notably, jurisprudence has it that the right to security of tenure is unavailing in certain instances. In Orcullo Jr. v. Civil Service Commission, [12] it was ruled that the right is not available to those employees whose appointments are contractual and co-terminous in nature. Such employment is characterized by "a tenure which is limited to a period specified by law, or that which is coterminous with the appointing authority or subject to his pleasure, or which is limited to the duration of a particular project for which purpose employment was made."[13] In Amores M.D. v. Civil Service Commission, [14] it was held that a civil executive service appointee who meets all the requirements for the position, except only the appropriate civil service eligibility, holds the office in a temporary capacity and is, thus, not entitled to a security of tenure enjoyed by permanent appointees.
	GR No. 172144 2010-03-09	PEZA BOARD OF DIRECTORS v. GLORIA J. MERCADO CARPIO MORALES, J.
In the CES under which the position of PEZA Deputy Director General for Policy and Planning is classified, the acquisition of security of tenure which presupposes a permanent appointment is governed by the Rules and Regulations promulgated by the CES Board. As the recent case of Amores vs. Civil Service Commission explains:[6]