Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

	GR No. 171674 2009-08-04	DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM v. CARMEN S. TONGSON PERALTA, J.
In Landbank of the Philippines v. Carolina B. Vda. de Abello, et al.,[26] this Court ruled: Under the factual circumstances of the case, the agrarian reform process is still incomplete as the just compensation to be paid respondents has yet to be settled. Considering the passage RA 6657 before the completion of this process, the just compensation should be determined and the process concluded under the said law. Indeed, this Court has time and again upheld the applicability of RA 6657, with PD 27 and EO 228 having only suppletory effect, conformably with our ruling in Paris v. Alfeche.