This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2012-02-08 |
SERENO, J. |
||||
| However, respondents' purported omissions, standing alone, cannot be construed as fraudulent or deceitful. Petitioner did not present evidence of actual fraud and merely inferred that because of the omissions, the respondent contractors were in bad faith. "Fraud is never presumed but must be established by clear and convincing evidence. The strongest suspicion cannot sway judgment or overcome the presumption of regularity."[10] | |||||