This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2011-01-18 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| The issue is not novel. In Office of the Ombudsman v. Civil Service Commission cases, [4] Home Insurance Guarantee Corporation v. Civil Service Commission [5] and National Transmission Corporation v. Hamoy, [6] the Court has consistently ruled that the CES covers presidential appointees only. Corollarily, as the position of Department Manager II of the PEZA does not require appointment by the President of the Philippines, it does not fall under the CES. | |||||
|
2010-11-23 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| The above 2007 case was, in turn, cited by the Court two years later in National Transmission Corporation v. Hamoy,[61] where again, it was categorically stated that the CES covers only presidential appointees: Petitioner also cites Caringal v. Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) and Erasmo v. Home Insurance Guaranty Corporation, to show that a presidential appointment is not required before a position in a government corporation is classified as included in the CES. We are not convinced. | |||||