This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2011-11-28 |
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J. |
||||
| In Maagad v. Maagad,[18] we explained: It is well-settled that a judicial admission conclusively binds the party making it. He cannot thereafter take a position contradictory to, or inconsistent with his pleadings. Acts or facts admitted do not require proof and cannot be contradicted unless it is shown that the admission was made through palpable mistake or that no such admission was made.[19] | |||||