Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 200077 2014-09-17	PEOPLE v. ADEL RAMOS Y ABELLANA PEREZ, J.
In this case, Ramos' gun and continual threats were enough to make AAA cower in fear. Thus, the lower courts did not err in finding that Ramos employed enough force and intimidation to consummate his purpose in mind.[18] And as correctly held by the trial court, the fact that she was able to sleep after the first incident of rape is a trivial matter and does not affect the positive and categorical testimony of AAA about the rape.[19]
	GR No. 188560 2010-12-15	PEOPLE v. RICKY ALFREDO Y NORMAN VELASCO JR., J.
It should be noted that for alibi to prosper, it is not enough for the accused to prove that he was in another place when the crime was committed. He must likewise prove that it was physically impossible for him to be present at the crime scene or its immediate vicinity at the time of its commission.[40]
	GR No. 186539 2010-06-29	PEOPLE v. MITSUEL L. ELARCOSA VELASCO JR., J.
Concerning this, it bears stressing that for alibi to prosper, it is not enough for the accused to prove that he was in another place when the crime was committed. He must likewise prove that it was physically impossible for him to be present at the crime scene or its immediate vicinity at the time of its commission.[33]
	GR No. 184600 2010-03-09	PEOPLE v. ANACITO DIMANAWA NACHURA, J.
In People of the Philippines v. Henry Guerrero y Agripa,[16] we explained -