You're currently signed in as:
User

CHINA AIRLINES v. DANIEL CHIOK

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2006-05-05
CORONA, J.
Both the RTC and CA found that respondent had satisfactorily proven the factual bases for the damages adjudged against the petitioner. This is a factual matter binding and conclusive upon this Court.[23] It is well-settled that -