This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-09-04 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| A common carrier is presumed to have been negligent if it fails to prove that it exercised extraordinary vigilance over the goods it transported.[8] When the goods shipped are either lost or arrived in damaged condition, a presumption arises against the carrier of its failure to observe that diligence, and there need not be an express finding of negligence to hold it liable.[9] | |||||