Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. FERNANDO SAMENIANO

This case has been cited 6 times or more.

	GR No. 200800 2015-02-09	PEOPLE v. OSCAR SEVILLANO Y RETANAL PEREZ, J.
In the prosecution of the crime of murder as defined in Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code (RPC), the following elements must be established by the prosecution: (1) that a person was killed; (2) that the accused killed that person; (3) that the killing was attended by treachery; and (4) that the killing is not infanticide or parricide.[10]
	GR No. 182523 2012-09-15	PEOPLE v. EFREN LAURIO Y ROSALES LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
In the present case, appellant has failed to produce any scintilla of evidence to warrant a reexamination of the facts and circumstances as found by the RTC and affirmed by the Court of Appeals. In any event, well-settled is the rule that the testimony of a single eyewitness, if credible and positive, is sufficient to support a conviction, even in a charge of murder.[23]
	GR No. 190317 2011-08-22	PEOPLE v. LARRY TORRES VELASCO JR., J.
The elements of the crime of murder are: (1) that a person was killed; (2) that the accused killed that person; (3) that the killing was attended by any of the qualifying circumstances mentioned in Art. 248 of the Revised Penal Code; and (4) that the killing is not parricide or infanticide.[9] Treachery was alleged in the information as qualifying circumstance for the charge of murder.
	GR No. 191721 2011-01-12	PEOPLE v. ROGELIO DOLORIDO Y ESTRADA VELASCO JR., J.
In conclusion, all the elements of the crime of murder, as defined in paragraph 1 of Art. 248 of the RPC, were successfully proved: (1) that a person was killed; (2) that the accused killed that person; (3) that the killing was attended by treachery; and (4) that the killing is not infanticide or parricide.[26]
	GR No. 192581 2010-11-17	PEOPLE v. DENNIS D. MANULIT VELASCO JR., J.
In conclusion, all the elements of the crime of murder, as defined in par. 1, Art. 248 of the RPC, were successfully proved: (1) that a person was killed; (2) that the accused killed that person; (3) that the killing was attended by treachery; and (4) that the killing is not infanticide or parricide.[49]