Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

RENATO MIGUEL D. GARCIA v. PERSHING T. YARED

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	AM No. P-14-3214 2015-09-14	VICENTE RAUT-RAUT v. ROMEO B. GAPUTAN PERALTA, J.
A sheriffs duty in the execution of a writ is purely ministerial; he is to execute the order of the court strictly to the letter. He has no discretion whether to execute the judgment or not. He is mandated to uphold the majesty of the law as embodied in the decision. When a writ is placed in the hands of a sheriff, it is his duty, in the absence of any instructions to the contrary, to proceed with reasonable celerity and promptness to execute it according to its mandate.[15]
	AM No. P-12-3029 2012-08-15	ASTORGA v. LEODEL N. ROXAS LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
It is almost trite to say that execution is the fruit and end of the suit and is the life of law. A judgment, if left unexecuted, would be nothing but an empty victory for the prevailing party.[13]
	GR NO. 167968 2006-01-23	VICENTE FLORENTINO v. RIVERA YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
It is almost trite to say that execution is the fruit and end of the suit and is the life of the law. A judgment, if left unexecuted, would be nothing but an empty victory for the prevailing party. [30] Litigation must end sometime and somewhere. An effective and efficient administration of justice requires that once a judgment has become final, the winning party be not deprived of the fruits of the verdict. Courts must, therefore, guard against any scheme calculated to bring about that result. Constituted as they are to put an end to controversies, courts should frown upon any attempt to prolong them. [31]