You're currently signed in as:
User

METROPOLITAN WATERWORKS v. ESM TRADING CORPORATION

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2011-04-12
BERSAMIN, J.
On February 4, 2010, petitioner-intervenors City of Santiago, City of Legazpi, and City of Iriga filed their separate Manifestations with Supplemental Ad Cautelam Motions for Reconsideration.[9] Similar manifestations with supplemental motions for reconsideration were filed by other petitioner-intervenors, specifically: City of Cadiz on February 15, 2010;[10]  City of Batangas on February 17, 2010;[11] and City of Oroquieta on February 24, 2010.[12]  The Court required the adverse parties to comment on the motions.[13]  As directed, the respondents complied.