Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. ROBERT GOMEZ

This case has been cited 5 times or more.

	GR Nos. 204481-82 2015-10-14	ALBERT G. AMBAGAN v. PEOPLE VELASCO JR., J.
Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assailing the June 21, 2012 Decision,[1] as effectively reiterated in the October 31, 2012 Resolution[2] of the Sandiganbayan First Division in Crim. Case Nos. 28259-60, finding and declaring herein petitioner Albert G. Ambagan, Jr. (Ambagan), among others, guilty of the crime of double homicide by inducement for the deaths of SPO2 Reynaldo Santos (Santos) and Domingo Bawalan.
	GR NO. 144640 2006-06-26	RODOLFO TIGOY v. CA AZCUNA, J.
Direct proof of previous agreement to commit an offense is not necessary to prove conspiracy.[15] Conspiracy may be proven by circumstantial evidence.[16] It may be deduced from the mode, method and manner by which the offense is perpetrated, or inferred from the acts of the accused when such acts point to a joint purpose and design, concerted action and community of interest.[17] It is not even required that the participants have an agreement for an appreciable period to commence it.[18]
	GR No. 144598 2004-02-06	PEOPLE v. RANIL DUETES CARPIO MORALES, J.
As to the civil aspect of the case, in line with prevailing jurisprudence, the award of indemnity to the heirs of the victim in the amount of P50,000.00 is affirmed, it being awarded without need of proof other than the fact that a crime was committed resulting in the death of the victim and that the accused was responsible therefor.[41]
	GR No. 140618 2003-12-10	PEOPLE v. BERNARDO SARA CARPIO MORALES, J.
As to the civil aspect of the case, the Court of Appeals correctly too increased the award of indemnity to the heirs of the victim from P30,000.00 to P50,000.00 in line with prevailing jurisprudence, which award needs no proof other than the fact that a crime was committed resulting in the death of the victim and that the accused was responsible therefor.[81]
	GR No. 141217 2003-09-26	PEOPLE v. EUSEBIO DUBAN Y DOMINGO CARPIO MORALES, J.
As to the civil aspect of the case, in line with prevailing jurisprudence, the award of indemnity to the heirs of the victim in the amount of P50,000.00 is affirmed, it being awarded without need of proof other than the fact that a crime was committed resulting in the death of the victim and that the accused was responsible therefor.[22]