This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2010-02-11 |
NACHURA, J. |
||||
| error on the part of the RTC as would warrant a deviation from this well-entrenched rule.[23] | |||||
|
2009-02-13 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| These circumstances are proven facts. We are convinced that at around 2:00 a.m. of February 2, 2000, appellant shot his wife twice on the head and breast, causing her death. Though there is no direct evidence, we have previously ruled that direct evidence of the actual killing is not indispensable for convicting an accused when circumstantial evidence can adequately establish his or her guilt.[25] | |||||