This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2010-12-07 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| The OSG then points to the continued existence and validity of other executive orders and presidential issuances creating similar bodies to justify the creation of the PTC such as Presidential Complaint and Action Commission (PCAC) by President Ramon B. Magsaysay, Presidential Committee on Administrative Performance Efficiency (PCAPE) by President Carlos P. Garcia and Presidential Agency on Reform and Government Operations (PARGO) by President Ferdinand E. Marcos.[18] | |||||
|
2007-03-30 |
CALLEJO, SR., J. |
||||
| Indeed, it is not within the power of the Court to pass upon or look into the wisdom of the inclusion by Congress of the sugar lands in the coverage of RA 6657. It is basic in our form of government that the judiciary cannot inquire into the wisdom or expediency of the acts of the executive or the legislative department, for each department is supreme and independent of the others, and each is devoid of authority not only to encroach upon the powers or field of action assigned to any of the other departments, but also to inquire into or pass upon the advisability or wisdom of the acts performed, measures taken or decisions made by the other departments.[52] | |||||
|
2005-08-09 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| It is settled that rules of procedure are, as a matter of course, construed liberally in proceedings before administrative bodies.[39] Administrative bodies are not bound by the technical niceties of law and procedure and the rules obtaining in the courts of law.[40] Rules of procedure are not to be applied in a very rigid and technical manner, as rules of procedure are used only to help secure and not to override substantial justice.[41] | |||||